Hershey Med cited for failing to monitor 6-year-old who died

Keep Reading ↓

Hershey Med cited for failing to monitor 6-year-old who died

Penn State Hershey Medical Center has been cited for failing to sufficiently monitor the temperature of a 6-year-old boy who was placed under a special heating blanket and died after his temperature reached 107.6 degrees, according to the Pennsylvania Department of Health.

The health department further cited the medical center for failing to immediately report the death to a state agency that studies such events to prevent repeats.

According to the health department, the boy was brought to the emergency room around 3 p.m. on Jan. 10 with a body temperature of 89.4 degrees. The average normal body temperature is 98.6 degrees. He was given a blanket-type warming device called a “Bair Hugger.”

The medical center’s policy calls for the temperatures of patients placed under such heating or cooling devices to be checked at least every two hours. The health department concluded the child’s temperature was checked and recorded at acceptable intervals until 12:14 a.m. on Jan. 11, when it was 98 degrees.

But his temperature wasn’t recorded again for more than 10 hours, when someone checked on him around 10 a.m. Jan. 11 and found no vital signs. Some 22 minutes later, his temperature was 107.6 degrees, and a physician determined the heating device had been on high all night, according to the health department report.

The child was transferred to the pediatric intensive care unit and declared dead at 5:39 p.m. Jan. 11, the health department wrote.

The medical center, while not disputing the health department’s conclusions, said in a written statement Wednesday that child was affected by “complex and life-limiting health issues. He was brought to our Emergency Department for low body temperature and presumed [blood infection].”

The health department further cited the medical center for failing to report the event to the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority. State law requires such events involving death or serious injury to be reported to the authority within 24 hours. Instead, the Patient Safety Authority learned of the event through an anonymous report from a medical center employee.

The medical center reported the event 77 days after it took place and only after the Patient Safety Authority asked about it, according to the health department.

Such reports don’t include patient names and similar personal information, but contain details of the event. The Patient Safety Authority then studies the causes and often issues information and guidelines to all Pennsylvania hospitals with the goal of preventing repeat events.

The health department required the medical center to carry out an extensive plan of correction. That plan included:

Discussing procedures for documenting vital signs with the nurses who were involved, and making sure all ER nurses are aware of requirements for monitoring patients and documenting results
Making sure all staff nurses and agency nurses are properly trained regarding the use of heating and cooling devices
Making sure agency nurses follow medical center policies and are given regular performance reviews
Making sure agency nurses are properly evaluated
Informing all doctors about the January death and reminding them of reporting requirements and procedures

This incident was first reported by investigative reporter Walter F. Roche Jr. on one of his blogs, www.healthlaw-privacy.blogspot.com.

Below is the full response issued by the medical center on Aug. 23 to PennLive.

In March, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center leadership was made aware of an anonymous report submitted to the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority about the death of a child at our medical center in mid-January.

The patient was a 6-year-old boy with ongoing, complex and life-limiting health issues. He was brought to our Emergency Department for low body temperature and presumed sepsis. The boy was placed under a ‘Bair Hugger’ – a device that uses forced hot air to raise a patient’s temperature. After spending the night in the E.D., his blood pressure dropped and his temperature rose to 107 degrees, prompting escalation to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit the following morning. He died several hours later. Subsequent review of his chart revealed no documentation of his temperature over a 10-hour period.

This situation raised serious issues, and our response has been equally serious.

Upon being notified by the Patient Safety Authority of the anonymous letter, we contacted the Pennsylvania Department of Health (DOH), prompting a visit from DOH representatives in April. Investigation into this matter revealed that an agency nurse was overseeing the child’s care during the 10-hour gap in temperature documentation, and no one involved in the child’s care reported the incident to our Patient Safety Department or submitted a report through our reporting system. Patient safety events, which are incidents that result in harm to or death of a patient, are required to be reported to our Patient Safety Officer within 24 hours. Such incidents that are determined to be “serious events” must also be reported to the DOH within 24 hours of the hospital’s confirmation of the event.

Based on the initial findings of the investigation completed by the DOH, we were cited with five issues related to a serious event. These issues focused on the failure to report the patient safety issue, failure to meet standards of care, and failure to evaluate and ensure the orientation of agency nurses when we hire them.

As an organization that holds itself accountable for providing the highest quality care while protecting the safety of patients, employees and visitors, we recognize this situation as an unacceptable failure. We expect more of ourselves as a system and as individuals committed to the highest standards of care for each person we serve. We have responded with the utmost of focus and determination to do better. During the DOH on-site investigation, we immediately developed a corrective plan of action for each issue identified. Just as importantly, we launched our own investigation to determine what happened, how it happened and how to prevent it from ever occurring again.

We immediately began to implement measures to address this specific circumstance and enhance the overall safety of care. Among these activities, we required every Medical Center employee–not only those with direct patient care responsibilities–to undergo training to ensure the timely reporting of patient safety events. Our “standard of care” policies across the Medical Center (including the Children’s Hospital) were reviewed and updated to ensure consistency with best practices. To ensure these policies are being followed, we are conducting random audits of patient records. Use of the Bair Hugger device for pediatric patients is now limited to the operating rooms, where patients are continuously attended. Finally, we created a new process to more consistently onboard and track all agency nurses, to ensure that their skills and training meet our standards, and to ensure timely evaluations of their performance.

We have submitted our formal corrective plans of action and summarized the significant progress already made in achieving these measures to the DOH. As a result of the period of time between the onsite investigation and receipt of the formal written notice of the citations on June 26, the vast majority of the action items have already been completed, and accepted by the DOH.

As a health system dedicated to providing the very best care to the most acutely ill and injured patients, we are deeply saddened that this death occurred and are taking action to prevent this type of event from ever occurring again.